
PC's Helpdesk gives home computer users independent, helpful and straightforward advice.
Whatever your skill levels, having a friendly voice at the end of the phone helps you get your work done.
I'll be adding to the news page on a fairly regular basis, mostly with content from the monthly newsletters, with additional links to some interesting news stories.
If there's something you'd like me to cover in the newsletter, just let me know. And if you want to receive the newsletter yourself, check out my helpdesk service - subscribers get it for free!
| February 22, 2010 | Latest newsletter headlines | |
| February 10, 2010 | Germany & France say "Don't use Internet Explorer!" | |
| November 13, 2009 | Free alternatives to popular programs | |
| October 21, 2009 | Thoughts on Windows 7 |
Extending the life of your laptop battery
Alternatives to Internet Explorer
As most of you know, I'm not a big fan of Microsoft's Internet Explorer browser. It's OK, but there are other, more secure alternatives. To back this up, the French and German governments have both come out to say "Don't use internet Explorer!", which is pretty damning.
In my own experience, I've come across users who've found their computers infected with a virus or trojan. Without exception, they've all used Internet Explorer rather than, say, Firefox. One of Microsoft's recent updates fixed a security hole that's been around for 17 years!
According to reports on the BBC web site, both France and Germany recommended that users stopped using Internet Explorer. And while Microsoft rejected their recommendations, I'd rather play it safe.
Remember that paid-for programs are usually slightly easier to use. This is primarily because the companies that created them have thrown a bucket of money at getting the interface right, which is something the free program writers don't have the luxury of doing - they have to rely on groups of volunteers, and while the results are often good, they usually aren't as slick.
I tend to recommend that users wait a little while before they buy any new products from Microsoft: they have some excellent products but, like most big organisations, their release dates are generally driven by marketing needs rather than technical confidence. So there are often a few bugs to iron out.
In the past I've said "Wait until Microsoft releases the first service pack", and while that still holds true for their Office products, there's an interesting problem with the new Windows 7 operating system.
Here's the thing: Windows 7's predecessor, Vista, is horrible. Not just a bit nasty, but really horrible. It grabs a huge proportion of your computer's resources just to run, it's slow, buggy and unfriendly. If you Google "I hate Vista", you'll get more than 3 million web pages!
And this isn't the first time that Microsoft has messed up. Some of you might remember Windows ME from a decade ago and it was generally regarded as a stop-gap before they finished XP. It was just as vile as Vista and I can't think of a single person who had anything nice to say about it.
So, if you're getting a new computer, should you get Vista and wait for Windows 7? My thinking, for once, is no. Windows 7 is pretty stable and much friendlier to use. It's a lot faster than Vista, doesn't seem to crash as much and Microsoft is updating it on a regular basis.